Categories
hst137

Reflection on Ceramics and Porcelain

The discussion with other students via Hypothes.is was helpful and insightful. I studied the workforce behind and the types of kilns for porcelain from the readings. From my classmates’ posts and additional readings, I learned the history and production of porcelain. Porcelain was first made in the Yuan dynasty (1279-1368). It then was popularized and expanded in the following era, in the Ming dynasty (1368-1844). There are different kinds of porcelain, depending on the region and time period, and each have its own techniques, glazes, and appearances that make up its identity. Chinese porcelain was valuable in trade and ended up in various parts of the world. However, despite porcelain’s rich history, specific directions on how to create porcelain was not recorded or shared until the 17th century–several centuries after its discovery.

Similar to printmaking, there was a lack of attention to the creating process of porcelain until much later. The artists and laborers that make these important objects were also not the focus of history, despite their major role in society.

Things I Learned this Week

  • There was an ambiguous coexistence between imperial and private kilns.
  • Jingdezhen is known for the making of porcelain.
  • Emperors oversaw the production process of porcelain because of how important the porcelain objects were.

Bibliographic References

Finlay, Robert. “The Pilgrim Art: The Culture of Porcelain in World History.” Journal of World History 9, no. 2 (1998): 141-87.

Gerritsen, Anne. The City of Blue and White : Chinese Porcelain and the Early Modern World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2020.

Ho, Soleil. “The Rich, Complex History Hiding Within Chinese Plate Designs”. Thrillist, June 10, 2019. URL: https://www.thrillist.com/eat/nation/chinese-plate-design-history

Slides

Categories
hst137

Ceramics and Creators

Before diving into the content, I would like to note and appreciate the seamless transition from last week into this week. The understanding of historic objects and materials is rooted in the earnest learning of their production and their creators.

Chapter 9 of The City of Blue and White : Chinese Porcelain and the Early Modern World focuses on the ceramic workforce in early China, including the types of laborers and craftsmen; division of labor; their abilities; their pay rate; the relationship between this kind of work and tax, family, and government; and the management of these workers.

The imperial and private kilns managed to coexist and sometimes benefit or lose from each other. Skilled laborers were consistently in demand. The administrators of imperial kilns hired skilled workers from private kilns. Both the quality and quantity of the imperial kilns’ porcelain vessels were typically below those of private kilns due to access to able potters, as well as the mindset of the craftsmen, and number of objects occupying the kilns when firing.

Because there was a distinct difference in quality of the demanded ceramics between those made by imperial kilns and those by private kilns, the private kilns could have issued higher prices for their goods and beat the imperial kilns. However, they responded, instead, by making lower quality objects–cheaper materials and fewer invested hours, but I do not understand why private kilns decided to go this route.

Blue & white palace-style bowl made by a private kiln.

Bibliographic References

Gerritsen, Anne. The City of Blue and White : Chinese Porcelain and the Early Modern World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2020.

Ho, Soleil. “The Rich, Complex History Hiding Within Chinese Plate Designs”. Thrillist, June 10, 2019. URL: https://www.thrillist.com/eat/nation/chinese-plate-design-history

Slides

css.php